[PSUBS-MAILIST] K-250 side viewport and dome hatch.

Mon Sep 28 13:21:51 EDT 2020

If you do drill holes in the ports, be sure when you anneal them, air can flow through the holes.  I read that somewhere. 
Hank

Sent from my iPhone

> On Sep 28, 2020, at 11:03 AM, irox via Personal_Submersibles <personal_submersibles at psubs.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> The Nekton subs do have bolt holes in the viewports.  While it was permitted 50+ years old when they where built, rules for viewport specifications were changed (in the 1980s I believe) to no longer permit holes in the viewports.
> While the holes do weaken the viewport, I heard that a big factor was a fatal accident involving Nekton Beta, where a boat being salvaged broke free and collided with Beta's conning tower damaged a viewport causing flooding,
> and ultimately an attempt to exit the submarine at depth, resulting in the death of one of the crew.
> 
> 
> Note, for hatch sealing, the 'best' (at I've been lead to believe) is a metal to metal seal, the o-ring only provides protection for the first few feet, until pressure is high enough to give a complete metal-on-metal seal.
> 
> Good luck!
>  Ian.
> 
> -----Original Message----- 
> From: Jon Wallace via Personal_Submersibles 
> Sent: Sep 28, 2020 9:26 AM 
> To: Personal Submersibles General Discussion 
> Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] K-250 side viewport and dome hatch. 
> 
> Attachment holes through viewports are not currently accepted as safe practice even though there are some early model submarines that did utilize that configuration.  Sean could likely give a better description but in laymen terms those holes introduce stress and fatigue that could lead to development of cracks within the acrylic material and seriously weaken it.  I think the Nekton series used such a configuration but those submarines were certified and therefore went through intense engineering study and testing.  Any comment Vance?
> 
> Peter Madsen drilled holes in his view ports to attach them to his submarine UC3, but Peter was also a risk-taker generally and I don't believe he ever dove UC3 to any serious depth.  There's a video somewhere of him swapping out a view port underwater.
> 
> 
> 
> On Monday, September 28, 2020, 10:57:13 AM EDT, Philippe Robert via Personal_Submersibles <personal_submersibles at psubs.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> Upgrade on adding view port too. But now I will follow Jon advice,  better to do what I see on the plan.
> 
> Le lun. 28 sept. 2020 10 h 47 a.m., Philippe Robert <phelop at gmail.com> a écrit :
> Ok.
> 
> Le lun. 28 sept. 2020 10 h 38 a.m., Sean T. Stevenson via Personal_Submersibles <personal_submersibles at psubs.org> a écrit :
> "Upgrade" is a problematic term. When I design seals, I typically do an exhaustive evaluation to determine whether standard O-rings will work, and if not, then I start looking at other options. For this application, O-rings work well, and I am hard pressed to come up with any possible justification to use something different.
> 
> Sean
> 
> -------- Original Message --------
> On Sep. 28, 2020, 08:17, Philippe Robert via Personal_Submersibles < personal_submersibles at psubs.org> wrote:
> 
> Thanks for the advice, my goal is to build my submarine safeste as possible, but if I can upgrade sealing and design it will be great.
> 
> Le dim. 27 sept. 2020 10 h 46 p.m., Sean T. Stevenson via Personal_Submersibles <personal_submersibles at psubs.org> a écrit :
> In fact, there's nothing inherently wrong with rectangular cross section seals, provided they are implemented in the same manner as O-ring seals with a captive groove, managed extrusion gap, designed gap fill and designed maximum squeeze of the seal. Absent those controls, a simple flat gasket presents not only a severe risk of extrusion, but can be subject to damage and consequent failure if maximum squeeze is not constrained. When properly designed, however, rectangular cross section seals can perform essentially as an O-ring seal with integral backup rings in terms of extrusion resistance.
> 
> Standard O-ring seals have the advantage of having a massive body of performance data available, and a freely available comprehensive design resource in the Parker O-ring Guide (ORD5700). Seals with custom geometries will generally require independent design verification in the form of FE models and destructive testing.
> 
> Sean
> 
> 
> -------- Original Message --------
> On Sep. 27, 2020, 18:10, hank pronk via Personal_Submersibles < personal_submersibles at psubs.org> wrote:
> Hi Philipe,
> You have to machine the dome seat flat anyways, so adding an o-ring groove is a small extra step.
> Hank 
> 
> On Sunday, September 27, 2020, 4:36:22 PM MDT, Alan via Personal_Submersibles <personal_submersibles at psubs.org> wrote: 
> 
> 
> Hi Philipe,
> I don't know of any submersibles that don't use o-rings as the hatch sealing method.
> I believe there is a danger of a flat rubber seal extruding inward under pressure.
> Alan 
> 
> 
> On 28/09/2020, at 10:32 AM, Jon Wallace via Personal_Submersibles <personal_submersibles at psubs.org> wrote:
> 
> Follow the plans.  The sections you reference are all related to the pressure hull and should not be modified.
> 
> Jon
> 
> 
> On Sunday, September 27, 2020, 04:47:54 PM EDT, Philippe Robert via Personal_Submersibles <personal_submersibles at psubs.org> wrote: 
> 
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I currently make the conning tower. I see on the internet some k-250 with front and side viewport in addition of the acrylics dome. Some of the viewport is close to the gusset and I assume that is not possible to do a 100% weld. Is it acceptable ? Is it ok to drill hole in the viewport to put retaining bolts ?  Second question, on the blueprint, the sealing option for the hatch on the conning tower is o'ring groove. Is it possible to make better sealing like flat rubber strip or something like that ?
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Philippe
> _______________________________________________
> Personal_Submersibles mailing list
> Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
> http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles
> _______________________________________________
> Personal_Submersibles mailing list
> Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
> http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles
> _______________________________________________
> Personal_Submersibles mailing list
> Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
> http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles
> _______________________________________________
> Personal_Submersibles mailing list
> Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
> http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles
> _______________________________________________
> Personal_Submersibles mailing list
> Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
> http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles
> _______________________________________________
> Personal_Submersibles mailing list
> Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
> http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles
> _______________________________________________
> Personal_Submersibles mailing list
> Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
> http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.whoweb.com/pipermail/personal_submersibles/attachments/20200928/e5c9234e/attachment-0001.html>