<div dir="auto">Hi Brian and all,<div dir="auto">I'm just going through commissioning a new/modified rebreather which is a bit relevant to this. I believe (sort of at odds with conventional training manuals) that it's valuable to experience the physiological signs and symptoms of the various gases at incorrect levels. Your other systems should of course protect you and be highly conservative, but you never know.</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">To that end, after a recent long dive I continued to breather the scrubber at home on the couch (for several hours) until the high CO2 effects were noticeable. I've also had a controlled low oxygen experience that I consider valuable. Both worth doing, maybe even regularly - I'd like to do high oxygen one but that's been a bit tricky so far.</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">If anyone has plans to be exiting a partially flooded sub at depths below 30m/100ft then a nitrogen narcosis experience would be extremely valuable. Especially with quick compression, your mental faculties deteriorate rapidly. Even at that depth, and it gets worse as you go deeper. I don't dive below 50m on air because I barely know what I'm doing.</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Cheers,</div><div dir="auto">Steve Fordyce</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 18 Mar 2018 2:04 pm, "Cliff Redus via Personal_Submersibles" <<a href="mailto:personal_submersibles@psubs.org">personal_submersibles@psubs.org</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">See <font face="Times New Roman" size="6"><font face="Times New Roman" size="6"></font></font><p align="LEFT"><font face="Times New Roman" size="6"><font face="Times New Roman" size="6"><b>DESIGN GUIDELINES </b></font></font><font face="Times New Roman" size="6"><font face="Times New Roman" size="6">FOR</font></font></p><font face="Times New Roman" size="6"><font face="Times New Roman" size="6">
<p align="LEFT">CARBON DIOXIDE SCRUBBERS</p>
</font></font><font face="Times New Roman" size="5"><font face="Times New Roman" size="5"><p align="LEFT">I</p>
</font></font><font face="Times New Roman" size="5"><font face="Times New Roman" size="5"></font></font><p align="LEFT"><font face="Times New Roman" size="5"><font face="Times New Roman" size="5">MAY </font></font><b><font face="Times New Roman" size="5"><font face="Times New Roman" size="5">1983</font></font></b></p><b><font face="Times New Roman" size="5"><font face="Times New Roman" size="5">
</font></font></b><font face="Times New Roman" size="5"><font face="Times New Roman" size="5"></font></font><p align="LEFT"><font face="Times New Roman" size="5"><font face="Times New Roman" size="5">REVISED </font></font><b><font face="Times New Roman" size="5"><font face="Times New Roman" size="5">JULY 1985</font></font></b></p><b><font face="Times New Roman" size="5"><font face="Times New Roman" size="5">
</font></font></b><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"><p align="LEFT">Prepared by</p>
<div>M. L. NUCKOLS, A. PURER, G. A. DEASON</div><div><br></div><div>for the philological affects of high CO2 level but if you abort the test if you ever exceed 5000 ppm, you should be safe. In addition to the CO2 issues, you should also familrrize yourself with both <strong><font color="#6a6a6a">Hypoxia</font></strong> which describes levels lower than Normoxia, or percentages lower than 21% and <em><strong><font color="#6a6a6a">hyperoxic</font></strong></em> breathing gas when levels rise above 22% of oxygen. Hypoxia would come from running out of makeup O2 or leaving the O2 supply valve closed by accident and hyperoic state would most likely be caused by a high pressure leak of O2 into the cabin caused by a loose fitting. I would recommend you abort the test if O2 concentration falls outside the acceptable range as defined by ABS.</div><div><br></div><div>When you go back and analyze the test, it is helpful to have data logged cabin atmosphere parameters including, CO2 and O2 concentrations, cabin pressure and temperature and relative humidity.</div><div><br></div><div>Cliff</div></font></font></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 5:37 PM, Brian Cox via Personal_Submersibles <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:personal_submersibles@psubs.org" target="_blank">personal_submersibles@psubs.<wbr>org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;font-size:10pt"><div>Hi All,</div><div> Thinking about testing my life support. Will obviously have some people outside the sub watching me, and talking via radio. But I was wondering if there would be a point at which I should abort the test when the CO2 gets to a certain point . If it levels off and stays at a constant but is some what elevated would it be ok to monitor that situation ? Like say it levels off at 2000 ppm and assuming my oxygen is at a constant 20.8 % ? </div><span class="m_2644839510413535639HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><div> </div><div>Brian</div><div> </div><div> </div></font></span></div>
<br>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
Personal_Submersibles mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Personal_Submersibles@psubs.org" target="_blank">Personal_Submersibles@psubs.or<wbr>g</a><br>
<a href="http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.psubs.org/mailman/l<wbr>istinfo.cgi/personal_submersib<wbr>les</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>
<br>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
Personal_Submersibles mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Personal_Submersibles@psubs.org">Personal_Submersibles@psubs.<wbr>org</a><br>
<a href="http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.psubs.org/mailman/<wbr>listinfo.cgi/personal_<wbr>submersibles</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div></div>