<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"></head><body>
<div>Alec,</div><div>I purchased my controller from Kelly Controller. It has been good so far.</div><div>Thanks,</div><div>Scott Waters</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div id="composer_signature"><div style="font-size:85%;color:#575757">Sent from my U.S. Cellular® Smartphone</div></div><br><br>-------- Original message --------<br>From: Alec Smyth via Personal_Submersibles <personal_submersibles@psubs.org> <br>Date: 04/19/2016 4:45 PM (GMT-06:00) <br>To: Personal Submersibles General Discussion <personal_submersibles@psubs.org> <br>Subject: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Speed controllers <br><br><div dir="ltr"><div>Hi all,</div><div><br></div><div>I need to finalize my selection of speed controllers for Shackleton over the next week or so, and at first blush am looking at this one from Roboteq:</div><div><br></div><div><a href="http://www.roboteq.com/index.php/docman/motor-controllers-documents-and-files/documentation/datasheets/hbl23xx/59-hbl23xx-datasheet/file">http://www.roboteq.com/index.php/docman/motor-controllers-documents-and-files/documentation/datasheets/hbl23xx/59-hbl23xx-datasheet/file</a></div><div><br></div><div>There will be two of them, each driving a pair of MK101 thrusters. Roboteq offers a controller family that is a step down from this and still handles the required amperage, and which is tempting because it's much less expensive. However, the specs are too close for comfort (50A continuous duty rating vs. MK101 requirement of 46A).</div><div><br></div><div>Anyone have any suggestions for other cost-effective controllers to consider?</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Thanks,</div><div><br>Alec</div></div>
</body></html>