<html><head></head><body><p dir="ltr">Jon, do you have a copy of the Machinery's Handbook? Standard fits and tolerances for hole based and shaft based fits in nominal sizes in both inch and metric are covered. I can look it up for you on Tuesday if you like. Regardless, get a copy of that book if you don't have one.</p>
<p dir="ltr">Sean<br>
</p>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On February 15, 2016 6:46:53 AM MST, Jon Wallace via Personal_Submersibles <personal_submersibles@psubs.org> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<pre class="k9mail"><br />I'm looking for a clearance recommendation between shaft and bore that <br />provides for easy shaft insertion but very little slop side to side. I <br />promise I am not being sexually provocative here, just trying to get <br />specs for an electrical penetrator. If the bore is 1 inch diameter <br />let's say, would I want to spec out .95? .995?<br /><br />Jon<br /><br /><br /><hr /><br />Personal_Submersibles mailing list<br />Personal_Submersibles@psubs.org<br /><a href="http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles">http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles</a><br /></pre></blockquote></div></body></html>