<HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><font face="Courier New" size=2>It would be not
so easy to make 1/10 T- frames 
or welds.. </font><BR><BR>"hank pronk via
Personal_Submersibles" <<A
href="mailto:personal_submersibles@psubs.org">personal_submersibles@psubs.org</a>>
schrieb:<BR>> <BR>> Hi Cliff<BR>> Thank you, that is perfect. 
<BR>> Hank--------------------------------------------<BR>> On
Tue, 12/30/14, Cliff Redus via Personal_Submersibles <<A
href="mailto:personal_submersibles@psubs.org">personal_submersibles@psubs.org</a>>
wrote:<BR>> <BR>>  Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] model
testing<BR>>  To: "Personal Submersibles General Discussion" <<A
href="mailto:personal_submersibles@psubs.org">personal_submersibles@psubs.org</a>><BR>>
 Received: Tuesday, December 30, 2014, 9:44 AM<BR>>  <BR>> 
Hank,<BR>>  just to bring closure to this thread.  Stress on the
boat<BR>>  due to depth scales geometrically between motel
and<BR>>  prototype.  Drag scales based on Reynolds<BR>> 
number.<BR>>  As an example<BR>>  for stress, go to Psubs.org flat
acrylic viewport calculator<BR>>  that Jon coded based on PVHO <a
href="http://www.psubs.org/design/viewports/1ATMFD/">http://www.psubs.org/design/viewports/1ATMFD/</a><BR>>
 Put in a 500 ft depth and a 10"<BR>>  viewable diameter Di and
record all results for the acrylic<BR>>  viewport.  Repeat with
same depth but 1/10" the<BR>>  viewable diameter, i.e., 1" and record
results.  Note<BR>>  that all dimension scale
geometrically.  This is based on<BR>>  the assumption that the
material is isotropic. These<BR>>   results would not be true
for anisotropic materials like a<BR>>  carbon fiber layup were
material properties are <BR>>  directional dependent. 
Additionally for carbon fiber, you<BR>>  would not be able to scale
the scale the size of the<BR>>  fibers.<BR>>  So if you
are<BR>>  using an isotropic material such as steel, and can
fabricate<BR>>  a dimensionally corrected scaled model of a
component like<BR>>  a pressure hull including details like weld
filler size,<BR>>  then crush depth observed in the motel test cell
would match<BR>> the full scale prototype.  Like
any experiment, you would<BR>>  need multiple test to average
the results.<BR>>  Cliff<BR>>  <BR>>  <BR>>  <BR>> 
<BR>>  Cliff Redus<BR>>  Redus Engineering<BR>>  USA<BR>> 
mobile:  830-931-1280<BR>>  <A
href="mailto:cliffordredus@sbcglobal.com">cliffordredus@sbcglobal.com</a>
<BR>>          From: hank pronk via<BR>> 
Personal_Submersibles<BR>>  <<A
href="mailto:personal_submersibles@psubs.org">personal_submersibles@psubs.org</a>><BR>>
 <BR>>  To: Personal<BR>>  Submersibles General Discussion<BR>>
 <<A
href="mailto:personal_submersibles@psubs.org">personal_submersibles@psubs.org</a>>
<BR>>  <BR>>  Sent: Monday,<BR>>  December 29, 2014 2:41
PM<BR>>   Subject: Re:<BR>>  [PSUBS-MAILIST] model testing<BR>>
  <BR>>   <BR>>  <BR>>  I am not<BR>>  looking for drag
comparisons, I am looking for failure due<BR>>  to pressure
comparisons.  I though I read that the Nekton<BR>>  subs<BR>>
  were built as a model first to establish crush depth.<BR>> 
Hank<BR>>  --------------------------------------------<BR>>  On
Mon, 12/29/14, Cliff Redus via<BR>>  Personal_Submersibles <<A
href="mailto:personal_submersibles@psubs.org">personal_submersibles@psubs.org</a>><BR>>
 wrote:<BR>>  <BR>>   Subject: Re:<BR>>  [PSUBS-MAILIST] model
testing<BR>>   To:<BR>>  "Personal Submersibles General
Discussion" <<A
href="mailto:personal_submersibles@psubs.org">personal_submersibles@psubs.org</a>><BR>>
  Received: Monday, December 29, 2014, 3:06<BR>>  PM<BR>>  
<BR>>   Drag<BR>>  <BR>>  results between a model and full
scale does not scale<BR>>   geometrically.  You have to scale
model and<BR>>  full scale off<BR>>   the dimensionless
 Reynolds<BR>> number.   Reynolds number<BR>>  
scaling<BR>>  enables you to scale results between model and
full<BR>>   scale using either a water tunnel or air<BR>>  
tunnel.<BR>>   Cliff<BR>>   <BR>>    <BR>>   <BR>>
         From: Alan James via<BR>>  
Personal_Submersibles<BR>>   <<A
href="mailto:personal_submersibles@psubs.org">personal_submersibles@psubs.org</a>><BR>>
  <BR>>   To: Personal<BR>>   Submersibles General
Discussion<BR>>   <<A
href="mailto:personal_submersibles@psubs.org">personal_submersibles@psubs.org</a>><BR>>
 <BR>>   <BR>>   Sent: Monday,<BR>>   December 29, 2014 1:55
PM<BR>>   <BR>>  Subject: Re:<BR>>   [PSUBS-MAILIST]
model<BR>>  testing<BR>>    <BR>>    <BR>>  
Hank,I just ran<BR>>   a test on my<BR>>  pressure program &
you get the same crush<BR>>   depthon a<BR>>   sphere of
A516-70<BR>>  steel that is 1000mm diameter & 10mm<BR>> 
<BR>>  thick as youdo on a<BR>>   sphere 100mm diameter<BR>> 
& 1mm thick.What I am<BR>>   not sure of is if<BR>>  you can
scale up the drag results on a<BR>>  <BR>>  model.If you<BR>>  
have a scale model that is<BR>>  1/50th & it takes X amount
of<BR>>   force to<BR>>  push<BR>>   it at 3<BR>> 
 knots, can<BR>>  you multiply X by 50 to get the required<BR>> 
<BR>>  thrust?Alan<BR>>     <BR>>   <BR>>    
<BR>>     From: Brian Cox<BR>>  via<BR>>  
Personal_Submersibles<BR>>  <BR>>  <<A
href="mailto:personal_submersibles@psubs.org">personal_submersibles@psubs.org</a>><BR>>
  <BR>>   To: Personal<BR>>   Submersibles General
Discussion<BR>>   <<A
href="mailto:personal_submersibles@psubs.org">personal_submersibles@psubs.org</a>><BR>>
 <BR>>   <BR>>   Sent: Tuesday,<BR>>   December 30, 2014 8:43
AM<BR>>   <BR>>  Subject: Re:<BR>>   [PSUBS-MAILIST]
model<BR>>  testing<BR>>    <BR>>    <BR>>  
Hank,<BR>>       I would say<BR>>   no.  It
would have to be so exact that it<BR>>  would be<BR>>   virtually
impossible to<BR>>  extrapolate from the small model,<BR>>  
and<BR>>    aside from that I think there are other<BR>> 
engineering<BR>>   principles involved that would<BR>>  come into
play , Sean would<BR>>   be the person<BR>> to ask !   I
know that it is done in wave<BR>>  <BR>>  tanks and wind tunnels,
but in those you are looking at<BR>>   laminar flow and such things,
not structural<BR>>  strength so<BR>>   much.  You might be
able to<BR>>  get a rough idea of how it<BR>>   would start
to<BR>>  collapse maybe.  The larger the model the<BR>> 
<BR>>  better I would think.<BR>>   <BR>>  <BR>> 
Brian<BR>>   <BR>>   --- <A
href="mailto:personal_submersibles@psubs.org">personal_submersibles@psubs.org</a><BR>>
  wrote:<BR>>   <BR>>  <BR>>  From: hank pronk via<BR>>  
Personal_Submersibles<BR>>  <<A
href="mailto:personal_submersibles@psubs.org">personal_submersibles@psubs.org</a>><BR>>
  To: <A
href="mailto:personal_submersibles@psubs.org">personal_submersibles@psubs.org</a><BR>>
  Subject: [PSUBS-MAILIST] model testing<BR>>   Date: Mon, 29 Dec
2014 10:52:46 -<A href="callto:0800">0800</a><BR>>   <BR>>   Hi
all<BR>>   If<BR>>  you<BR>>   make a scale model of a
submarine in<BR>>  complete detail. <BR>>   Scale the size
and metal<BR>>  thickness, is it a reasonable<BR>>  <BR>> 
representation of depth capabilities when pressure<BR>>  
tested?<BR>>   Hank<BR>>  <BR>> 
_______________________________________________<BR>>  
Personal_Submersibles mailing list<BR>>   <A
href="mailto:Personal_Submersibles@psubs.org">Personal_Submersibles@psubs.org</a><BR>>
  <a
href="http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles">http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles</a><BR>>
  <BR>>   <BR>>  <BR>> 
_______________________________________________<BR>>  
Personal_Submersibles mailing list<BR>>   <A
href="mailto:Personal_Submersibles@psubs.org">Personal_Submersibles@psubs.org</a><BR>>
  <a
href="http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles">http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles</a><BR>>
  <BR>>   <BR>>    <BR>>     <BR>>  <BR>> 
_______________________________________________<BR>>  
Personal_Submersibles<BR>>   mailing list<BR>>   <A
href="mailto:Personal_Submersibles@psubs.org">Personal_Submersibles@psubs.org</a><BR>>
  <a
href="http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles">http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles</a><BR>>
  <BR>>   <BR>>     <BR>>   <BR>>   -----Inline
Attachment<BR>>  Follows-----<BR>>   <BR>>  <BR>> 
_______________________________________________<BR>>  
Personal_Submersibles mailing list<BR>>   <A
href="mailto:Personal_Submersibles@psubs.org">Personal_Submersibles@psubs.org</a><BR>>
  <a
href="http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles">http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles</a><BR>>
  <BR>>  <BR>> 
_______________________________________________<BR>> 
Personal_Submersibles mailing list<BR>>  <A
href="mailto:Personal_Submersibles@psubs.org">Personal_Submersibles@psubs.org</a><BR>>
 <a
href="http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles">http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles</a><BR>>
 <BR>>     <BR>>  <BR>>  -----Inline Attachment
Follows-----<BR>>  <BR>> 
_______________________________________________<BR>> 
Personal_Submersibles mailing list<BR>>  <A
href="mailto:Personal_Submersibles@psubs.org">Personal_Submersibles@psubs.org</a><BR>>
 <a
href="http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles">http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles</a><BR>>
 <BR>> <BR>>
_______________________________________________<BR>>
Personal_Submersibles mailing list<BR>> <A
href="mailto:Personal_Submersibles@psubs.org">Personal_Submersibles@psubs.org</a><BR>>
<a
href="http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles">http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles</a><BR>>
<BR><font face="Courier New" size=2> </font></BODY></HTML>