<html><head></head><body><p dir="ltr">Metric is easier to debug, but yes, it will have the archaic units as well. ;-)</p>
<p dir="ltr">Sean<br>
</p>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On April 10, 2014 6:44:06 AM MDT, Jon Wallace <jonw@psubs.org> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<pre class="k9mail"><br />Max working depth...his calculator shows a .67 usage factor. I'm <br />hoping Sean is going to include English units in the final product :)<br /><br /><br /><br />On 4/10/2014 7:53 AM, swaters wrote:<br /><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #729fcf; padding-left: 1ex;"> Sean,<br /> When you are talking about boyancy of the sphere, is the 1152m the design depth or crush depth. If it is the design depth, then that boyancy vs shell thickness in ASME 516 gr 70 is perfect! If not then might have to do some more thinking<br /> Thanks,<br /> Scott Waters</blockquote><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><hr /><br />Personal_Submersibles mailing list<br />Personal_Submersibles@psubs.org<br /><a href="http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles">http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles</a><br /></pre></blockquote></div><br>
-- <br>
Sent from Kaiten Mail. Please excuse my brevity.</body></html>