[PSUBS-MAILIST] onboard gear

[Jon Wallace via Personal_Submersibles]

Slight off-topic, thanks to Sean, Tom, Rick, Stephen and others for sharing their expertise on this topic.  You guys are incredible and an absolute wealth of knowledge.  Can't believe how lucky we are to have you in our group.
My own thoughts are that in terms of actual implementation Stephen's message is the most realistic.  It's not just the R300 that doesn't have room to carry the gaseous equipment for such escape, it's almost certainly the vast majority of K-subs and those based off the Kittredge design.  That's why taking this activity seriously, fabricating to standards, testing to standards, peer review by fellow submariners, maintenance and safety plans is so important.  Our greatest and most dependable safety plan is a vessel that survives diving parameters and returns to the surface every time.  That reduces risk to issues such as entanglement that might necessitate escape, however like all extreme activities I think it is axiomatic that ours is not without risk.
Jon
      From: Stephen Fordyce via Personal_Submersibles <personal_submersibles at psubs.org>
 To: Personal Submersibles General Discussion <personal_submersibles at psubs.org> 
 Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2019 12:14 AM
 Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] onboard gear
   

I hate to be negative, but perhaps for deep PSUB diving, the inability to escape is just one of those residual risks that can be accepted for a recreational activity.

   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.whoweb.com/pipermail/personal_submersibles/attachments/20190424/96de3eb3/attachment.html>